Hula hoop hasn't fallen

Date: 2006-04-07 07:01 am (UTC)
To be fair, this is pre-alpha unreleased software you're testing.

I won't argue with the code base quality, you're basically right. However, it was much worse when it was released. There are two options: a) do a Mozilla, or b) do a OpenOffice.org. While there are pros/cons with both approachs, I think the evolution rather than revolution approach is correct in this case: the basic Hula design and architecture is sound and tested, most of the problems are at a local code level rather than an architectural level.

That's not to say there's no revolution: the queue system has been refactored, and the main mailstore - the heart of the system - is being completely replaced. Also, the upcoming caldav support is completely new.

There were no testsuites when it released, there are now: if you look around you'll find a few, and they'll only grow.

I'm not trying to convince you to change your mind; Hula at this stage isn't really ready for use (indeed, earlier versions where much more useful). But, sometime this summer it will start becoming useful and I wouldn't dismiss it yet.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

April 2010

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 24th, 2025 04:15 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios